On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 16:36 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Rohit Seth wrote: > > > > How does the containers implementation under discussion behave if a > > > process is part of a container and the container is removed? > > It first removes all the tasks belonging to this container (which means > > resetting the container pointers in task_struct and then per page > > container pointer belonging to anonymous pages). It then clears the > > container pointers in the mapping structure and also in the pages > > belonging to these files. > > So the application continues to run unharmed? >
It will hit a one time penalty of getting those pointers reset, but besides that it will continue to run fine. > Could we equip containers with restrictions on processors and nodes for > NUMA? > Yes. That is something we will have to do (I think part of CPU handler-TBD). -rohit ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
