On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 03:00 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > (this time to the lists as well) > > Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > I'd much rather containterize the whole reclaim code, which should not > > be too hard since he already adds a container pointer to struct page. > >
Right now the memory handler in this container subsystem is written in such a way that when existing kernel reclaimer kicks in, it will first operate on those (container with pages over the limit) pages first. But in general I like the notion of containerizing the whole reclaim code. > > I still have to reread what Rohit does for file backed pages, that gave > > my head a spin. Please let me know if there is any specific part that isn't making much sense. -rohit ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
