On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 10:52 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Rohit Seth wrote: > > > Right now the memory handler in this container subsystem is written in > > such a way that when existing kernel reclaimer kicks in, it will first > > operate on those (container with pages over the limit) pages first. But > > in general I like the notion of containerizing the whole reclaim code. > > Which comes naturally with cpusets.
How are shared mappings dealt with, are pages charged to the set that first faults them in? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
