You're right, it shouldn't matter, PowerPC
The next question coming will be OS related so I'll answer ahead of
time, OS is Mac OS X 10.4.x.
The reason is simple, I must support the OS the customer uses so
there is no upgrading the OS, no changing OS and no changing the
hardware.
Since it stopped building correctly/completely under GCC 4.x we were
left with no choice but to abandon it.
-- Dale
On Mar 24, 2014, at 18:57 PM, Brandon Perry wrote:
Dale,
Not that it *should* matter, but what is your architecture?
On 03/24/2014 05:33 PM, Shawn Webb wrote:
On what up-to-date OSs can I find gcc 4.0 in active use? I'll
briefly try
to recreate the problem in my spare time for you.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Dale Walsh
<d...@daleenterprise.com> wrote:
When it builds completely under GCC 4.0, I would be more than
happy to
offer detailed debugging information and dumps that would be
beneficial to
the project but as it stands, a bug report at bugzilla.clamav.net
isn't
anything I would consider wasting my time on but you are more
than welcome
to file the report yourself.
It makes no sense for me to file a report as I may use the source
files
but nothing else, I repackage it so I can build it and rather
than listen
to stupidity about my method of building being the root of the
problem,
informing you like other have should be sufficient to warrant an
in-depth
investigation into the matter.
-- Dale
On Mar 24, 2014, at 17:32 PM, Steven Morgan wrote:
Yes, a dmg issue and an xar issue were mentioned. If the issue
(s) remain,
please open a bug at bugzilla.clamav.net or send some files or --
debug
output.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Joel Esler (jesler)
<jes...@cisco.com
wrote:
Then I am sure the developers would be glad to help figure out the
problem
and fix it.
--
Joel Esler
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 22, 2014, at 13:32, "Dale Walsh" <d...@daleenterprise.com>
wrote:
0.98.1 DMG does not work.
-- Dale
On Mar 21, 2014, at 09:16 AM, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote:
DMG support was just added in the last version of ClamAV.
How long ago
did you do this testing?
On Mar 20, 2014, at 8:22 PM, Dale Walsh
<d...@daleenterprise.com>
wrote:
You did miss it but it's a two headed nail.
PDF, DMG, XAR and RAR have had issues not recognizing the
test viruses
to name just a couple that spring to mind that we've had
trouble with
and
this all started happening when the clang and crap entered the
picture.
I've worked with the developers in the past, once the build
environment dependancies changed and I was told I had to
upgrade my OS
and
build tools is when it was no longer possible to resolve these
issues as
the update solely for the purpose of building ClamAV is not an
option
and I
shouldn't be forced to use someone else's built tool
preferences just
because they have the luxury of updating on a whim or purely
for bragging
rights.
It does not matter if my OS is dated, security patches are
applied to
the build tools as they become available and this seems to
satisfy all
other software that build from source except ClamAV.
Having everything build with GCC 4.0 would allow me/us to re-
deploy
ClamAV and contribute to the code base again (I have in the
past) but
the
chances of this are slim to non from what I recall because my
OS and
build
tools are dated and listening to rants about ancient and
deprecated is
nothing more than someone spewing stupidity.
The fact that I ensure all bugs and updates to the build
tools are
fixed/added allows me to keep everything in harmony and there
is no
reason
to update anything to build a single software package when all
other
software sources seem to be content with the existing build
environment.
If you wish to go off-list to continue the discussion I have no
objections.
-- Dale
On Mar 20, 2014, at 16:35 PM, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote:
Dale,
Thanks for your email. I'm not sure exactly what you are
referring
to. Maybe I am missing a connection here or something, but the
discussion
was around scanning DMG and XAR, which I think, if there's a
issue with,
we'd be more than happy to work with anyone to try and square
away.
You seem to be discussing a build issue, and you say that
it's a
waste of time. When did you get the impression that working
with the
developers was a waste of time? If we're not communicating
well enough,
we
can fix that. But I think the team is doing a good job of that
judging
by
the amount of complaints I have received since we took over the
project
from the old ClamAV team.
Please let me know if we need to take this offline and
discuss or
anything I can do to help.
--
Joel Esler
Open Source Manager
Threat Intelligence Team Lead
Vulnerability Research Team
On Mar 20, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Dale Walsh
<d...@daleenterprise.com
<mailto:d...@daleenterprise.com>> wrote:
Mark, this has been an issue for many versions along with a
slew of
others things not working as expected.
As much as I liked ClamAV, we've abandoned it as a mail
solution
shortly after things stopped working correctly and they
changed the
required build tools so you can no longer build it with GCC
3.3/4.0/4.1/4.2
and have a fully functional app.
Yes there are flags to get it to build but certain modules and
features don't build and making an incomplete and partially
functional
binary isn't appealing.
Advice on updating build tools is a waste of time as there
is no
reason to update the build tools just to build ClamAV as
it's the
only one
that has this ridiculous built-tool requirement and only an
idiot would
tell me to update.
My thoughts on this is simple, if it doesn't build with the
basic GNU
GCC compiler tools then it's seriously flawed and needs
these other
tools
to overcome the short-comings of poorly written/implemented code.
When I say build, I mean build with full functionality so
don't go
off the deep-end stating it builds, partial functionality
may be
acceptable
to you bhut it isn't to me.
At this time, for personal use, I use the source code but
repackage
the build environment to work with what I have and I'm
comfortable
with
submitting corrections and patches, too much focus and
complaints on my
build tools so why waste my time.
-- Dale
On Mar 19, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Rafael Ferreira wrote:
Interesting... let me run some tests and get back to you.
On Mar 19, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Mark Allan <markjal...@gmail.com
<mailto:
markjal...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Just out of interest, did you test to see if it *actually*
worked?
My configure output shows that dmg and xar are supported,
but it
doesn't actually detect the Eicar test file within a disk
image.
configure: Summary of engine detection features
autoit_ea06 : yes
bzip2 : ok
zlib : /usr
unrar : yes
dmg and xar : yes, from /usr
When I create a new disk image, copy the Eicar test file
in, and scan
the dmg, it shows up as being clean.
clamscan test.dmg
test.dmg: OK
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Known viruses: 3259558
Engine version: 0.98.1
Scanned directories: 0
Scanned files: 1
Infected files: 0
Data scanned: 10.07 MB
Data read: 10.02 MB (ratio 1.01:1)
Time: 4.845 sec (0 m 4 s)
Does this work as expected for anyone else?
Mark
On 10 Feb 2014, at 23:38, Rafael Ferreira <r...@uvasoftware.com
<mailto:r...@uvasoftware.com>> wrote:
That worked, thanks!
On February 10, 2014 at 4:29:41 PM, Steven Morgan (
smor...@sourcefire.com<mailto:smor...@sourcefire.com>) wrote:
Rafael,
Probably all you need to do install libxml&libxml2-dev,
which is used
by
dmg and xar, then do your configure/make.
Steve
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Rafael Ferreira <
r...@uvasoftware.com
<mailto:r...@uvasoftware.com>>wrote:
Folks,
I'm compiling clamav 0.98.1 on Linux (Ubuntu 12.04 LTS) and
I'm not
getting the new super awesome DMG and XAR file support:
configure: Summary of detected features follows
OS : linux-gnu
pthreads : yes (-lpthread)
configure: Summary of miscellaneous features
check : no (auto)
fanotify : yes
fdpassing : 1
IPv6 : yes
configure: Summary of optional tools
clamdtop : (auto)
milter : yes (disabled)
configure: Summary of engine performance features)
release mode: yes
jit : yes (auto)
mempool : yes
configure: Summary of engine detection features
autoit_ea06 : yes
bzip2 : ok
zlib : /usr
unrar : yes
dmg and xar : no
Am I missing a configure flag or third party library?
Thanks in advance,
- Rafael
----
scanii.com<http://scanii.com> - the web friendly malware
scanner!
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://
bugs.clamav.net
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://
bugs.clamav.net
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://
bugs.clamav.net
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://
bugs.clamav.net
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://
bugs.clamav.net
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://
bugs.clamav.net
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://
bugs.clamav.net
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://
bugs.clamav.net
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://
bugs.clamav.net
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://
bugs.clamav.net
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
