'CCFLAGS="-O0" ./configure && make' [root@localhost clamav-0.98.1]# clamscan/clamscan --version ClamAV 0.98.1 [root@localhost clamav-0.98.1]# uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.11-1.1369_FC4 #1 Thu Jun 2 22:55:56 EDT 2005 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux [root@localhost clamav-0.98.1]#
If you don't set CCFLAGS configure fails because of an optimization bug in the compiler, which is what I am assuming you are talking about by doesn't compile. Being nice gets you more friends on the internet, and everyone knows internet friends are the best kind of friends. :) On 03/25/2014 05:29 PM, Brandon Perry wrote: > Thanks, I don't have a PPC here, but I am going to install fedora core 4 > x86 and x86_64 inside of virtual machines and will see if I run into any > issues. > > Legacy systems are unfortunate. However, I think you would be hard > pressed to find any open source project today supporting that, so I > don't think it is that ridiculous to not expend the effort to actively > support it. I wouldn't be surprised if the code required to make it > compile on your system *and* modern systems caused performance decreases > (or even not compile on modern gcc!). > > There might be a small chance that you would need to maintain a separate > patchset to maintain this compatibility since having it compile on both > your legacy and modern systems would be detrimental to other ClamAV users. > > On 03/25/2014 05:18 PM, Dale Walsh wrote: >> You're right, it shouldn't matter, PowerPC >> >> The next question coming will be OS related so I'll answer ahead of >> time, OS is Mac OS X 10.4.x. >> >> The reason is simple, I must support the OS the customer uses so there >> is no upgrading the OS, no changing OS and no changing the hardware. >> >> Since it stopped building correctly/completely under GCC 4.x we were >> left with no choice but to abandon it. >> >> -- Dale >> >> >> >> On Mar 24, 2014, at 18:57 PM, Brandon Perry wrote: >> >>> Dale, >>> >>> Not that it *should* matter, but what is your architecture? >>> >>> On 03/24/2014 05:33 PM, Shawn Webb wrote: >>>> On what up-to-date OSs can I find gcc 4.0 in active use? I'll >>>> briefly try >>>> to recreate the problem in my spare time for you. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Dale Walsh >>>> <d...@daleenterprise.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> When it builds completely under GCC 4.0, I would be more than happy to >>>>> offer detailed debugging information and dumps that would be >>>>> beneficial to >>>>> the project but as it stands, a bug report at bugzilla.clamav.net >>>>> isn't >>>>> anything I would consider wasting my time on but you are more than >>>>> welcome >>>>> to file the report yourself. >>>>> >>>>> It makes no sense for me to file a report as I may use the source >>>>> files >>>>> but nothing else, I repackage it so I can build it and rather than >>>>> listen >>>>> to stupidity about my method of building being the root of the >>>>> problem, >>>>> informing you like other have should be sufficient to warrant an >>>>> in-depth >>>>> investigation into the matter. >>>>> >>>>> -- Dale >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mar 24, 2014, at 17:32 PM, Steven Morgan wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yes, a dmg issue and an xar issue were mentioned. If the issue(s) >>>>> remain, >>>>>> please open a bug at bugzilla.clamav.net or send some files or >>>>>> --debug >>>>>> output. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Joel Esler (jesler) >>>>>> <jes...@cisco.com >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Then I am sure the developers would be glad to help figure out the >>>>>>> problem >>>>>>> and fix it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Joel Esler >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mar 22, 2014, at 13:32, "Dale Walsh" <d...@daleenterprise.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 0.98.1 DMG does not work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- Dale >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2014, at 09:16 AM, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: >>>>>>>>> DMG support was just added in the last version of ClamAV. How >>>>>>>>> long ago >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> did you do this testing? >>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 8:22 PM, Dale Walsh <d...@daleenterprise.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> You did miss it but it's a two headed nail. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> PDF, DMG, XAR and RAR have had issues not recognizing the test >>>>>>>>>> viruses >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> to name just a couple that spring to mind that we've had >>>>>>>>> trouble with >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> this all started happening when the clang and crap entered the >>>>>>> picture. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've worked with the developers in the past, once the build >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> environment dependancies changed and I was told I had to >>>>>>>>> upgrade my OS >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> build tools is when it was no longer possible to resolve these >>>>>>> issues as >>>>>>> the update solely for the purpose of building ClamAV is not an >>>>>>> option >>>>>>> and I >>>>>>> shouldn't be forced to use someone else's built tool preferences >>>>>>> just >>>>>>> because they have the luxury of updating on a whim or purely for >>>>>>> bragging >>>>>>> rights. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It does not matter if my OS is dated, security patches are >>>>>>>>>> applied to >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> the build tools as they become available and this seems to >>>>>>>>> satisfy all >>>>>>> other software that build from source except ClamAV. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Having everything build with GCC 4.0 would allow me/us to >>>>>>>>>> re-deploy >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ClamAV and contribute to the code base again (I have in the >>>>>>>>> past) but >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> chances of this are slim to non from what I recall because my OS and >>>>>>> build >>>>>>> tools are dated and listening to rants about ancient and >>>>>>> deprecated is >>>>>>> nothing more than someone spewing stupidity. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The fact that I ensure all bugs and updates to the build tools >>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> fixed/added allows me to keep everything in harmony and there >>>>>>>>> is no >>>>>>> reason >>>>>>> to update anything to build a single software package when all other >>>>>>> software sources seem to be content with the existing build >>>>>>> environment. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If you wish to go off-list to continue the discussion I have no >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> objections. >>>>>>>>>> -- Dale >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 16:35 PM, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Dale, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your email. I'm not sure exactly what you are >>>>>>>>>>> referring >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> to. Maybe I am missing a connection here or something, but the >>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>> was around scanning DMG and XAR, which I think, if there's a >>>>>>> issue with, >>>>>>> we'd be more than happy to work with anyone to try and square away. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You seem to be discussing a build issue, and you say that it's a >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> waste of time. When did you get the impression that working >>>>>>>>>> with the >>>>>>> developers was a waste of time? If we're not communicating well >>>>>>> enough, >>>>>>> we >>>>>>> can fix that. But I think the team is doing a good job of that >>>>>>> judging >>>>>>> by >>>>>>> the amount of complaints I have received since we took over the >>>>>>> project >>>>>>> from the old ClamAV team. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if we need to take this offline and >>>>>>>>>>> discuss or >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> anything I can do to help. >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Joel Esler >>>>>>>>>>> Open Source Manager >>>>>>>>>>> Threat Intelligence Team Lead >>>>>>>>>>> Vulnerability Research Team >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Dale Walsh <d...@daleenterprise.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:d...@daleenterprise.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Mark, this has been an issue for many versions along with a >>>>>>>>>>> slew of >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> others things not working as expected. >>>>>>>>>>> As much as I liked ClamAV, we've abandoned it as a mail solution >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> shortly after things stopped working correctly and they >>>>>>>>>> changed the >>>>>>> required build tools so you can no longer build it with GCC >>>>>>> 3.3/4.0/4.1/4.2 >>>>>>> and have a fully functional app. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes there are flags to get it to build but certain modules and >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> features don't build and making an incomplete and partially >>>>>>>>>> functional >>>>>>> binary isn't appealing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Advice on updating build tools is a waste of time as there is no >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> reason to update the build tools just to build ClamAV as it's the >>>>>>> only one >>>>>>> that has this ridiculous built-tool requirement and only an idiot >>>>>>> would >>>>>>> tell me to update. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> My thoughts on this is simple, if it doesn't build with the >>>>>>>>>>> basic GNU >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> GCC compiler tools then it's seriously flawed and needs these >>>>>>>>>> other >>>>>>> tools >>>>>>> to overcome the short-comings of poorly written/implemented code. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> When I say build, I mean build with full functionality so >>>>>>>>>>> don't go >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> off the deep-end stating it builds, partial functionality may be >>>>>>> acceptable >>>>>>> to you bhut it isn't to me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> At this time, for personal use, I use the source code but >>>>>>>>>>> repackage >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the build environment to work with what I have and I'm >>>>>>>>>> comfortable >>>>>>> with >>>>>>> submitting corrections and patches, too much focus and complaints >>>>>>> on my >>>>>>> build tools so why waste my time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- Dale >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Rafael Ferreira wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Interesting... let me run some tests and get back to you. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Mark Allan <markjal...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> markjal...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Just out of interest, did you test to see if it *actually* >>>>>>>>>>> worked? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> My configure output shows that dmg and xar are supported, but it >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> doesn't actually detect the Eicar test file within a disk image. >>>>>>>>>>> configure: Summary of engine detection features >>>>>>>>>>> autoit_ea06 : yes >>>>>>>>>>> bzip2 : ok >>>>>>>>>>> zlib : /usr >>>>>>>>>>> unrar : yes >>>>>>>>>>> dmg and xar : yes, from /usr >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> When I create a new disk image, copy the Eicar test file in, >>>>>>>>>>> and scan >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the dmg, it shows up as being clean. >>>>>>>>>>> clamscan test.dmg >>>>>>>>>>> test.dmg: OK >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ----------- SCAN SUMMARY ----------- >>>>>>>>>>> Known viruses: 3259558 >>>>>>>>>>> Engine version: 0.98.1 >>>>>>>>>>> Scanned directories: 0 >>>>>>>>>>> Scanned files: 1 >>>>>>>>>>> Infected files: 0 >>>>>>>>>>> Data scanned: 10.07 MB >>>>>>>>>>> Data read: 10.02 MB (ratio 1.01:1) >>>>>>>>>>> Time: 4.845 sec (0 m 4 s) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Does this work as expected for anyone else? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mark >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 10 Feb 2014, at 23:38, Rafael Ferreira <r...@uvasoftware.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:r...@uvasoftware.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> That worked, thanks! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On February 10, 2014 at 4:29:41 PM, Steven Morgan ( >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> smor...@sourcefire.com<mailto:smor...@sourcefire.com>) wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Rafael, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Probably all you need to do install libxml&libxml2-dev, which >>>>>>>>>>> is used >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>> dmg and xar, then do your configure/make. >>>>>>>>>>> Steve >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Rafael Ferreira < >>>>>>>>>>> r...@uvasoftware.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:r...@uvasoftware.com>>wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm compiling clamav 0.98.1 on Linux (Ubuntu 12.04 LTS) and >>>>>>>>>>> I'm not >>>>>>>>>>> getting the new super awesome DMG and XAR file support: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> configure: Summary of detected features follows >>>>>>>>>>> OS : linux-gnu >>>>>>>>>>> pthreads : yes (-lpthread) >>>>>>>>>>> configure: Summary of miscellaneous features >>>>>>>>>>> check : no (auto) >>>>>>>>>>> fanotify : yes >>>>>>>>>>> fdpassing : 1 >>>>>>>>>>> IPv6 : yes >>>>>>>>>>> configure: Summary of optional tools >>>>>>>>>>> clamdtop : (auto) >>>>>>>>>>> milter : yes (disabled) >>>>>>>>>>> configure: Summary of engine performance features) >>>>>>>>>>> release mode: yes >>>>>>>>>>> jit : yes (auto) >>>>>>>>>>> mempool : yes >>>>>>>>>>> configure: Summary of engine detection features >>>>>>>>>>> autoit_ea06 : yes >>>>>>>>>>> bzip2 : ok >>>>>>>>>>> zlib : /usr >>>>>>>>>>> unrar : yes >>>>>>>>>>> dmg and xar : no >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Am I missing a configure flag or third party library? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> - Rafael >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ---- >>>>>>>>>>> scanii.com<http://scanii.com> - the web friendly malware >>>>>>>>>>> scanner! >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: >>>>>>>>>>> http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: >>>>>>>>>>> http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: >>>>>>>>>>> http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: >>>>>>>>>>> http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: >>>>>>>>>>> http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: >>>>>>>>>>> http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: >>>>>>>>>>> http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: >>>>>>>>>> http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>> _______________________________________________ >>> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >>> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html >> Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
