On Saturday 20 September 2003 4:04 pm, Daniel J McDonald wrote: > On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 18:47, Diego d'Ambra wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > Since the binary is completely missing it's difficult to create a > > signature that will catch the "damaged" versions of Gibe.F. > > You could probably match on the gif file that is included - I've got the > same 4.9K gif file on all 200 of them that I have received.
A gif is not a virus, so it should not be detected by an anti-virus program. Anyway, what's the point? Why bother blocking a 'damaged' copy of a virus, where 'damaged' actually means 'missing'? Regards, Antony. -- How should I know if it works? That's what beta testers are for. I only coded it. - Linus Torvalds ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
