On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 10:40, Antony Stone wrote: > On Saturday 20 September 2003 4:04 pm, Daniel J McDonald wrote: > > > On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 18:47, Diego d'Ambra wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > Since the binary is completely missing it's difficult to create a > > > signature that will catch the "damaged" versions of Gibe.F. > > > > You could probably match on the gif file that is included - I've got the > > same 4.9K gif file on all 200 of them that I have received. > > A gif is not a virus, so it should not be detected by an anti-virus program. > > Anyway, what's the point? Why bother blocking a 'damaged' copy of a virus, > where 'damaged' actually means 'missing'?
Do you want to receive 200 of these mails, like I did last night? Do you want your clueless users calling you all day asking why they can't find the patch that Microsoft e-mailed them? The mail ought to be killed. I think I managed to get the gif into Razor, but my ISP doesn't use razor, so I have to download them at home and then check razor before ditching them as spam. > > Regards, > > Antony. -- Daniel J McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Austin Energy ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
