Trog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What you don't seem to understand is that the "distinction between > technical attacks and social engineering attacks" is irrelevant, because > thats not what *any* anti-virus product has as a requirement.
So now you're declaring _my_ requirements irrelevant. I'm not surprised. > If you want to impose your own requirements, then *you* will have to put > in the work to fulfil them. So where do you take it from that I would not be willing to do so? I am just trying to find a solution that can be incorporated in the official ClamAV distribution so that not just me (and it's not just me who has that requirement, read some other postings) can benefit from it. > The rest of us don't much care. Speak only for yourself. :-) _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
