Ian Lewis wrote:
That is very interesting information Samuel. I shall be interested to compare
it to my own data.
We quarantine our emails just in case there are any which are genuine but
holding viruses. Not very likely but you never know.
Do I understand from what you say that having identified 4 million viruses
you reject them and they go 'back' to the often spoofed sender, still capable
of causing trouble?
I belive he meant rejected at SMTP level with a permanent error code (5.x.x)
--
'Can death be sleep, when life is but a dream' --John Keats
/* waiting... dreaming... wishing... */
_______________________________________________
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
