On Thursday 17 February 2005 11:29, Andy Fiddaman shaped the electrons to say: > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, [ISO-8859-2] BogusÅaw Brandys wrote: > > ; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > ; Hash: SHA1 > ; > ; Nigel Horne wrote: > ; > On Wednesday 16 Feb 2005 14:18, Ted Fines wrote: > ; > > ; > > ; >>FOUR MINUTES, 13 SECONDS for an 800k email. > ... > ; > 0.80 didn't scan it properly and would have let a virus through, 0.83 > fixes that bug. ; Oversized.Mail ? Do we need such new detection or is > better solution ? > > How about MailMaxMimeDepth and MailBlockMax directives ? Most other > scanners I've used default to block any message with over 10 levels of > mime nesting, maybe something like 25 is a good default though.
I even think that 25 is too much... -- Scott Ryan Telkom Internet _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
