On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:27:46 +0100 "Julian Mehnle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | I absolutely concur. Considering that exactly _no one_ here > demanded | that ClamAV abandon its capacity for detecting phishing > attacks, little | yellow rubber ducks in PNG images, or whatever else, > the uproar is truly | ludicrous. What was actually requested is that > there be an _option_ not | to scan for certain classes of malware. No > one would be disadvantaged | by that. Such an option will be available in 0.90. -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Mon Mar 21 20:32:45 CET 2005
pgpMOczBBXliJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
