Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> Julian Mehnle wrote:
> | I absolutely concur.  Considering that exactly _no one_ here demanded
> | that ClamAV abandon its capacity for detecting phishing attacks,
> | little yellow rubber ducks in PNG images, or whatever else, the uproar
> | is truly ludicrous.  What was actually requested is that there be an
> | _option_ not to scan for certain classes of malware.  No one would be
> | disadvantaged by that.
>
> Such an option will be available in 0.90.

Well, that is certainly a nice prospect!  Thanks a lot for not ignoring my
request.

_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Reply via email to