Brian Morrison wrote: > Julian Mehnle wrote: > > Probably more like: can we have 'technical-threats.cvd' and > > 'non-technical-threats.cvd' instead of 'main.cvd'? > > You don't give up do you? ;-)
Not until someone convincingly explains to me why my request for a practical option to distinguish between technical and non-technical threats (i.e. exploitation of technical flaws in software vs. exploitation of end-user naivet�) is inappropriate. _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
