On 2008/10/04 06:17 PM Rick Cooper wrote: > What he actually said was: > > "This is further aggravated by the fact that Exim does not know how to > gracefully handle failures of clamav daemon." > > It doesn't stop, it issues a temporary local problem deferral
MUA's do not understand temporary delivery failures. I guess it would be even worse if their mail was silently queued and not delivered, but that's besides the point. Neither situation is ideal and neither are Exim's fault that Clam can't make up its mind about what it would like to call its configuration. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
