On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Eric Shubert <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 09/30/2013 11:43 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>> The data files were omitted from the source tarball beginning with
>> version 0.97.5. I thought that made sense. Now with 0.98 they appear to
>> be back.
>> 
>> Is there any easy/preferred way to "make install" (or "configure")
>> without having the data files included? I'm packaging clamav-toaster,
>> and am obtaining the data files in the %post processing, and I don't
>> want them encumbering the rpm.
>> 
>> I poked around the makefiles a bit, but I'm not very familiar with them.
>> I'm thinking that a "make install-nodata" or some such would be nice.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
> 
> Thanks to both David and Bryan for their excellent suggestions. 
> Unfortunately, I made some bad presumptions (once again - DOH!) which led me 
> to believe that the data files were the cause of my source RPM ballooning.
> 
> After successfully omitting the database/ from the build, I still ended up 
> with a 36M srpm file, while the binary rpm was 13M.
> 
> Upon closer inspection, it appears that the clamav-devel/win32/ directory is 
> the source of excess.
> 
> Is the win32/ directory now a part of the tarball, or is this unintentional?

I thought you would have heard back by now, so I didn't respond, but in 
comparing it with the 0.97.8 tarball I see 0.98 also has a win32/ directory, 
but it did not contain the win32/clamav-for-windows/ directory which runs over 
70M.
  

-Al-
-- 
Al Varnell
Mountain View, CA



_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Reply via email to