On 10/04/2013 05:30 PM, Al Varnell wrote:
On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Eric Shubert <[email protected]> wrote:

On 09/30/2013 11:43 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
The data files were omitted from the source tarball beginning with
version 0.97.5. I thought that made sense. Now with 0.98 they appear to
be back.

Is there any easy/preferred way to "make install" (or "configure")
without having the data files included? I'm packaging clamav-toaster,
and am obtaining the data files in the %post processing, and I don't
want them encumbering the rpm.

I poked around the makefiles a bit, but I'm not very familiar with them.
I'm thinking that a "make install-nodata" or some such would be nice.

Thanks.


Thanks to both David and Bryan for their excellent suggestions. Unfortunately, 
I made some bad presumptions (once again - DOH!) which led me to believe that 
the data files were the cause of my source RPM ballooning.

After successfully omitting the database/ from the build, I still ended up with 
a 36M srpm file, while the binary rpm was 13M.

Upon closer inspection, it appears that the clamav-devel/win32/ directory is 
the source of excess.

Is the win32/ directory now a part of the tarball, or is this unintentional?

I thought you would have heard back by now, so I didn't respond, but in 
comparing it with the 0.97.8 tarball I see 0.98 also has a win32/ directory, 
but it did not contain the win32/clamav-for-windows/ directory which runs over 
70M.


-Al-


Thanks Al.

I wouldn't expect this to be in the tarball, but maybe so. Can anyone say whether or not the win32 stuff should be in there? Seems like a waste to me distributing everything to everybody.

--
-Eric 'shubes'

_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Reply via email to