On 10/09/2013 09:39 AM, David Raynor wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Eric Shubert <[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/04/2013 05:30 PM, Al Varnell wrote:
On Oct 3, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Eric Shubert <[email protected]> wrote:
On 09/30/2013 11:43 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
The data files were omitted from the source tarball beginning with
version 0.97.5. I thought that made sense. Now with 0.98 they appear to
be back.
Is there any easy/preferred way to "make install" (or "configure")
without having the data files included? I'm packaging clamav-toaster,
and am obtaining the data files in the %post processing, and I don't
want them encumbering the rpm.
I poked around the makefiles a bit, but I'm not very familiar with them.
I'm thinking that a "make install-nodata" or some such would be nice.
Thanks.
Thanks to both David and Bryan for their excellent suggestions.
Unfortunately, I made some bad presumptions (once again - DOH!) which led
me to believe that the data files were the cause of my source RPM
ballooning.
After successfully omitting the database/ from the build, I still ended
up with a 36M srpm file, while the binary rpm was 13M.
Upon closer inspection, it appears that the clamav-devel/win32/
directory is the source of excess.
Is the win32/ directory now a part of the tarball, or is this
unintentional?
I thought you would have heard back by now, so I didn't respond, but in
comparing it with the 0.97.8 tarball I see 0.98 also has a win32/
directory, but it did not contain the win32/clamav-for-windows/ directory
which runs over 70M.
-Al-
Thanks Al.
I wouldn't expect this to be in the tarball, but maybe so. Can anyone say
whether or not the win32 stuff should be in there? Seems like a waste to me
distributing everything to everybody.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
______________________________**_________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/**clamav-faq<https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq>
http://www.clamav.net/support/**ml <http://www.clamav.net/support/ml>
git archive usually pulls in the whole commit when making a tarball, but
you make a good point. I expect we won't go back and re-do the tarballs for
0.98, but we can take a look and make a decision for the next release.
Dave R.
Thanks Dave. Looking forward to a smaller tarball in the future. :)
--
-Eric 'shubes'
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
