> Open source is simply a phrase, incidentally preexisting the company >that trademarked it. As long as Sun uses it in that capacity, they are on >decent legal ground. Are you attempting to say that if we use "java" (in lowercase) to refer to a programming language similar to (but not identical to) Sun's Java, they can't sue us? I wouldn't be on it. If Open Source is properly registered as a certification mark, I doubt Sun could get away with using lower case open source either. -- Aaron M. Renn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/
- Re: Sun's Jini Technology Public License (JTPL) Erwin Bolwit
- Re: Sun's Jini Technology Public License (JTPL) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Sun's Jini Technology Public License (JT... Paul Fisher
- RE: Sun's Jini Technology Public License... John Keiser
- Re: Sun's Jini Technology Public Li... Paul Fisher
- RE: Sun's Jini Technology Publi... John Keiser
- Re: Sun's Jini Technology Publi... Paul Fisher
- Re: Sun's Jini Technology Publi... Michael Emmel
- Re: Sun's Jini Technology Publi... Chris Toshok
- Re: Sun's Jini Technology Public License (JTPL) Richard Stallman
- RE: Sun's Jini Technology Public License (JTPL) Aaron M. Renn
- RE: Sun's Jini Technology Public License (JTPL) John Keiser

