Re: I need your help!

[Brian Jones]

Bryce McKinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Personally I'm more interesting in doing a CNI-based AWT
> implementation, because I think CNI is better.
> 

It appears that libgcj has some jni work done already and it is just
my guess that this (jni.cc/jni.h) are supposed to be wrappers for CNI
method calls but most are commented as unimplemented.

Brian
-- 
Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>