Yes, I too am unclear on this issue. I saw mentioned way back in the
archives
that both libgcj and classpath would move to the GPL with a special
exception
for when the library is linked to an executable. So it'll be GPL in
source-code land,
but LGPL in binary-land. Does that sound mostly correct?
Sorry to harp on this issue, but the licensing affects my plans to use
classpath &
libgcj so I need to make sure I understand the nuances.
Thanks,
Steve
"Etienne M. Gagnon" wrote:
>
> I think I have I missed something important here. What is the licensing
> change? Won't Classpath be licensed under the GNU LGPL? I would really like
> to know.
