Tom Tromey wrote: > Emil> Hmm. I seem to recall that when RMS spoke in Lund, Sweden, a > Emil> couple of weeks back he endorsed Japhar. But as I think back on > Emil> it, maybe he was just encouraging people to help out with > Emil> Japhar, stressing the point that Japhar needs help. > > I'm curious why he would support Japhar and not libgcj. Is it because we don't have a catchy, coffee-related project codename? ;-) [ bryce ]
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Per Bothner
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Brian Jones
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Aaron M. Renn
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Brian Jones
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Emil Eifrem
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Emil Eifrem
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Tom Tromey
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Bryce McKinlay
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion David Himelright
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Tom Tromey
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Aaron M. Renn
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Mark Wielaard
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Nic Ferrier
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Tom Tromey
- Re: gnu.* namespace discussion Paul Fisher

