Am Donnerstag, 25. November 2004 17:09 schrieb Ewout Prangsma: > Hi all, > > When considering the line of VM classes, shouldn't the > FileChannelImpl class in gnu.java.nio not be called > VMFileChannel(Impl) in the java.nio package. > That way we all have the freedom how to implement it.
Yeah, it should be named VMFileChannel. We dont did that yet because of ... guess what ... right: laziness. > As an alternative (which is i my opinion better), a VMFileChannel > class should have a static member used to instantatie the > FileChannel implementation of choice. What do you mean by this ? Michael -- Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/ _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
