Jeremy,

 

You can't tell me that Cisco is introducing features so advanced that
the boxes we have now would not be capable of running it. The boxes we
run are nearly identical to probably 50% of the people not running Cisco
branded equipment, on this list.

 

There have been other issues in the last year related to the NAC that
have caused me to start evaluating other options, this is just icing on
the cake. One big reason we didn't switch this year was that we didn't
want to fuss with new equipment... I can only see Cisco losing customers
because of this. 

 

Michael Stanclift

Network Analyst

Rockhurst University

 

Conway Hall, Office 415

1100 Rockhurst Road

Kansas City, Missouri 64110

(816) 501-4231

 

From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy McGuinn
(jemcguin)
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 1:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Need to upgrade Server hardware....

 

Bruce and Michael, 

 

I understand your concerns about your internal end-of-life plans vs
Cisco introducing the appliance, but lets be reasonable. All
applications have changing hardware requirements depending on the
version you are using. 

 

Changing to a Cisco appliance may have many advantages over third party
hardware especially when it comes to Cisco's control over developing the
upgrade process, and in the long run it could be less expensive because
of the fact that the appliance is Cisco hardware and will have a longer
end-of-life.

 

I am just knuckle dragging engineer so please contact your account team
reps for a full cost justification of migrating to an appliance. Then
you can judge if it makes sense, and you will have a short/long term
cost justification for management.

 

Regards, 

 

Jeremy

 

________________________________

From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Osborne, Bruce W.
(NS)
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 1:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Need to upgrade Server hardware....

 

Todd,

 

So, does this mean that those of us that are using our own hardware will
either need to re-purchase them with appliances or move to a different
NAC solution?

 

That's a great upgrade plan!

 

Bruce Osborne

Liberty University

 

From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joyce, Todd N
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 12:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [CLEANACCESS] Need to upgrade Server hardware....

 

>From Cisco Live (Networkers) here is what I learned -

 

All 4.5 and higher will require the new Cisco hardware

 

4.5 Due in late Fall (Oct/Nov)

4.6 Due in Spring (March/April)

 

 

Todd Joyce
Network Services
Radford University - The Smart Choice
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
(540) 831-7777

 

Keep your boots and ChapStick and ice hotels.

Give me shorts and sandals and a thirty-blocker.

 

Temperance Brennan - Monday Mourning

 

________________________________

From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators on behalf of Mike
Linval
Sent: Mon 7/7/2008 11:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Need to upgrade Server hardware....

So we run CCA software on our own hardware, have since before Cisco
purchased it.  We are going to replace our hardware and so I went to the
Cisco website to check on supported hardware. 

Is the supported hardware info up to date?  We use Dell and they dont
even
offer some of the supported hardware specified in the document.  Also,
does
CCA support quad-core processors?


Thanks for the help

Reply via email to