> You meant to be consistent with the existing sub classes, right? Based on the fact that subclasses are not independent entities, but rather part of classes, my statement technically correct, as is yours. There, I out-pedanted you :)
> Since > they belong to different class, I don't think it is necessary. But I > don't feel strongly about this. I can change it if other people feel the > same. I don't feel strongly either. -Artem
