> > > ESC_DATALINK_NEW_PHYS > > > > Or perhaps ESC_DATALINK_PHYS_ADD, to be consistent with existing classes? > > You meant to be consistent with the existing sub classes, right? Since > they belong to different class, I don't think it is necessary. But I don't > feel strongly about this. I can change it if other people feel the same.
Since it's project private I don't care too much, but if one name is more consistent, let's use that. -- meem
