Peter Memishian wrote: > > > > ESC_DATALINK_NEW_PHYS > > > > > > Or perhaps ESC_DATALINK_PHYS_ADD, to be consistent with existing classes? > > > > You meant to be consistent with the existing sub classes, right? Since > > they belong to different class, I don't think it is necessary. But I don't > > feel strongly about this. I can change it if other people feel the same. > > Since it's project private I don't care too much, but if one name is more > consistent, let's use that. > Okay. The updated draft is again attached.
- Cathy -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: datalink_sysevent.txt URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/clearview-discuss/attachments/20080730/f9f5c9a7/attachment.txt>
