>>      * Regarding Example 2: if the rename-link is done after the
>>        "cfgadm -c configure", will IP get properly reconfigured with
>>        public0's configuration?  In other words, will the dladm
>>        rename-link cause the IP RCM module to get run again and thus
>>        make use of /etc/hostname.public0?  (IIRC, another way to do
>>        Example 2 is to do the dladm rename-link before the cfgadm
>>        configure).
> 
> I'm basing the order of the commands in this example on the following text 
> in Cathy's UV design doc:
> 
>      # cfgadm -c disconnect PCI8
>      remove bge0 and insert ce0
>      # cfgadm -c configure PCI8
>      # dladm rename-link ce0 net0
> 
>    Note that the order of the cfgadm and rename-link operations will
>    not matter, i.e., following configuration steps will achieve the
>    same result:
> 
>      # cfgadm -c disconnect PCI8
>      remove bge0 and insert ce0
>      # dladm rename-link ce0 net0
>      # cfgadm -c configure PCI8
> 
> I'm assuming that the two are equivalent.  The first order makes a ton more 
> sense to me, as you may not know what to rename until you plugin the new NIC 
> and run "cfgadm -c configure ...".  Maybe someone who has done DR testing 
> with UV can confirm.  Cathy, can you provide input on this?
> 
Yes, the order should not matter.

Thanks
- Cathy

Reply via email to