Kacheong Poon wrote: > Alan Maguire wrote: > > >> Sebastien Roy wrote: >> > > >>> Or is it simply that NWAM will always be enabled in Phase I? >>> >>> >> it won't, which makes me think this needs a lot more work in light of the >> consideration you've mentioned above. thanks again! >> > > > Is it true that NWAM phase 1 can be disabled? My worry > is that this can be confusing because NWAM has already > changed a lot in the network set up procedures. So it > can be quite confusing if NWAM can be disabled and some > how the old way to do network configuration is supported. > > If it is just a static configuration, there can be only > one NCP and one Environment. There is no automagic > switching. This mode will support all the existing network > configuration. Is this mode a problem? > Yes, I think it'll be better for us to always stay w/ NWAM. Or, I'm not sure if it is easy to change the restarter of those SMF instances (for datalinks) on-the-fly, especially when methods of SMF instances are implemented in a different way...
Max > >
