Max Zhen wrote: > >> Is it true that NWAM phase 1 can be disabled? My worry >> is that this can be confusing because NWAM has already >> changed a lot in the network set up procedures. So it >> can be quite confusing if NWAM can be disabled and some >> how the old way to do network configuration is supported. >> >> If it is just a static configuration, there can be only >> one NCP and one Environment. There is no automagic >> switching. This mode will support all the existing network >> configuration. Is this mode a problem? >> >> > Yes, I think it'll be better for us to always stay w/ NWAM. Or, I'm not > sure if it is easy to change the restarter of those SMF instances (for > datalinks) on-the-fly, especially when methods of SMF instances are > implemented in a different way... > > Max > my understanding is that having NWAM enabled by default was to be deferred until phase 2 when support for link aggregations, IPMP, and Crossbow VNICs would be added - the idea being that since NWAM phase 1 is not slated to support all configurations, it accordingly can't upgrade legacy configurations completely (if i've got these details wrong, someone chime in). thanks!
alan
