> Peter Memishian wrote:
>> I'm worried about skew between the actual libdlpi library and the 
>> libdlpi
>> architecture document.  That is, we're now adding functions that are not
>> in the architecture document, and it's going to get worse in the future
>> as more functions are added.
>>
>> I'd like to see the architecture document revised to describe all
>> functionality in the present tense (rather than the future), have the
>> legacy stuff (that described the old private libdlpi library) pulled 
>> out,
>> and updated to include these two functions.  Then we'll have a good
>> foundation to build on with future fasttracks, such as the upcoming
>> libdlpi DLPI notification work.
>>   
I've posted a revised libdlpi architecture document.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/clearview/libdlpi/libdlpi-psarc_proposal_update.txt

The PSARC fasttrack document for the mapping routines are at:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/clearview/libdlpi/libdlpi-psarc_mactype_mapping.txt
 


manpage for the mapping funcitons:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/clearview/libdlpi/libdlpi-api_mapping.txt 


thanks,
Sagun


Reply via email to