Forgot to mention: even with the suggested cassandra 1.x version, why are we
seeing this "-Xss 228k" problem ? I have to manually edit cassandra-env.sh
otherwise it won't start ? (that was also among the reasons pushing me to try
out the 2.0.2...) And, is Xss 228k really enough, or should we expect
malfunctioning at some point ?
T.
On 22/11/13 09:28, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> On 21/11/13 21:31, Matt Williams wrote:
>> If you do give this a go, please let us know how you get on! The
>> performance enhancements in Cassandra 2.0 look quite interesting.
>
> First issue I had was with the Cassandra update, that seemingly didn't update
> its own database, so I had to wipe out the whole folder manually, otherwise
> the Cassandra daemon wouldn't start.
> Second, the provisioning scripts for CW didn't work anymore because of the
> missing initial tables, which are created by the post-installation CW scripts.
> I gave up when seeing in the logs something about wrong invocation of cqlsh
> in the post-installation scripts, as I simply didn't want to spend ages in
> who knows how many other problems down the road :-). (cqlsh changed syntax
> from version to version ? -- AFAICR it was complaining about a "-3" ?!?)
>
> May I ask what is, instead, the correct procedure to ensure that all CW
> binary components are up-to-date on each machine ?
>
> I'm giving a try to "apt-get update; apt-get install
> clearwater-infrastructure (bono|sprout|homestead|homer)", but just to be sure
> that I didn't forget to update smth important.
>
> Thanks.
>
> T.
>
--
Tommaso Cucinotta, Computer Engineer PhD
Researcher at Alcatel-Lucent Bell Laboratories
Blanchardstown Business & Technology Park
Dublin - Ireland
_______________________________________________
Clearwater mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.projectclearwater.org/listinfo/clearwater
