On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Henry Story <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On 28 May 2011, at 08:55, Tsuyoshi Ito wrote: > > > Dear all > > > > If no existing API will be changed: > > Well the closing of 540 would also officially close 544 (which is still > closed waiting for 540 to be closed > even though officially this is not a legal Apache maneuvre). No, CLEREZZA-544 is not closed. I explained why I already committed code for that issue. But closing the issue this thread is about, would not prevent you from vetoing against 544. > And 544 does changes quite an important api. > It adds a method, it doesn't change neither signature nor behaviour. > > It adds a new method to CallbackRenderer > > public void render(UriRef resource, GraphNode context, String mode, > OutputStream os) throws IOException; > > I am not against such an addition were it not for the way GraphNodeProvider > is implemented currently. > [...] > > > Now this means that the GraphNodeProvider is not just a package for some of > Reto's pet projects, but > will be central to the working of Clerezza. In which case the issue of the > efficiency of it and the > decisions it makes on what is authoritative should be considered more > intently it seems to me. > I think that the Trunk is not a place for Pet projects anyway. Reto
