On 3 Jun 2011, at 13:29, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote: >> >> but that graph and something else, defined in some unrelated package. For >> me this does not make it easy to understand the code. >> > Obviously you don't. Would be good we find way to improve understanding of > the clerezza architecture without requiring blocking the evolution by > casting -1
If I had cast a -1 then you would have had to remove the code without my needing to give you an explanation, as you did recently to my code - only providing an explanation a week after the fact. So please don't exaggerate. If not closing an issue is the equivalent to a -1, then you are the biggest disher-out of -1 on this list. You added a GraphNodeProvider. I tried to use it to get GraphNodes for remote URIs, and discovered that I got the whole content graph, documentation graph, and a number of other graphs with it too. The reasons for introducing this were never explained - you only just did it now, with reference to a discobits application that is not available in ZZ trunk. I am trying to read your explanation there and am not finding it easy to understand.... Henry Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
