Hi Reto Thank you for the detailed explanations.
Cheers Tsuy On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Henry Story <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> On 28 May 2011, at 08:55, Tsuyoshi Ito wrote: >> >> > Dear all >> > >> > If no existing API will be changed: >> >> Well the closing of 540 would also officially close 544 (which is still >> closed waiting for 540 to be closed >> even though officially this is not a legal Apache maneuvre). > > No, CLEREZZA-544 is not closed. I explained why I already committed code for > that issue. But closing the issue this thread is about, would not prevent > you from vetoing against 544. > > >> And 544 does changes quite an important api. >> > It adds a method, it doesn't change neither signature nor behaviour. > >> >> It adds a new method to CallbackRenderer >> >> public void render(UriRef resource, GraphNode context, String mode, >> OutputStream os) throws IOException; >> >> I am not against such an addition were it not for the way GraphNodeProvider >> is implemented currently. >> > > [...] > >> >> >> Now this means that the GraphNodeProvider is not just a package for some of >> Reto's pet projects, but >> will be central to the working of Clerezza. In which case the issue of the >> efficiency of it and the >> decisions it makes on what is authoritative should be considered more >> intently it seems to me. >> > I think that the Trunk is not a place for Pet projects anyway. > > Reto >
