On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:27:56 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan <psadhuk...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> > > > I am not sure but to me the images dont seem to match in >>> > > > windows11..it seems JEditorPane image is 1 pixel thicker than golden >>> > > > images...in which case, it needs to be problemlisted Also, I guess >>> > > > this has potential of making it automated by loading the golden >>> > > > images and JEditorPane in BufferedImage and then compare... >>> > > >  >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > You mean to say the border of JEditorPane is 1 pixel thicker ? >>> > >>> > >>> > it doesn't look exactly same subjectively... >>> >  >>> >>> Yeah, but in instructions they say it should look similar, so wasn't sure >>> whether to problem list or proceed with conversion. You think we should >>> problem list? >> >> I am not sure...I think there was some fix regarding border stroke sometime >> back either by @honkar-jdk or @DamonGuy . Maybe expectation should be >> somewhat different now in which case... > >> > > > > I am not sure but to me the images dont seem to match in >> > > > > windows11..it seems JEditorPane image is 1 pixel thicker than golden >> > > > > images...in which case, it needs to be problemlisted Also, I guess >> > > > > this has potential of making it automated by loading the golden >> > > > > images and JEditorPane in BufferedImage and then compare... >> > > > >  >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > You mean to say the border of JEditorPane is 1 pixel thicker ? >> > > >> > > >> > > it doesn't look exactly same subjectively... >> > >  >> > >> > >> > Yeah, but in instructions they say it should look similar, so wasn't sure >> > whether to problem list or proceed with conversion. You think we should >> > problem list? >> >> I am not sure...I think there was some fix regarding border stroke sometime >> back either by @honkar-jdk or @DamonGuy . Maybe expectation should be >> somewhat different n... @prsadhuk With scaling 1.0 it'll appear this way. I think it's supposed to be 1.0 scaling and its looking similar now.  ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18260#issuecomment-2003914767