On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 10:28:57 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <i...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi all,
>> This PR fix file src/java.desktop/unix/native/libawt/awt/awt_LoadLibrary.c 
>> reported compile warning "ignoring return value of function" by clang17, 
>> which add check the return value of `realpath` function. Risk is low.
>> 
>> Additional testing:
>> 
>> - [x]  jtreg tests(include tier1/2/3) on linux-x64 with release build
>> - [x]  jtreg tests(include tier1/2/3) on linux-x64 with fastdebug build
>> - [x]  jtreg tests(include tier1/2/3) on linux-aarch64 with release build
>> - [x]  jtreg tests(include tier1/2/3) on linux-aarch64 with fastdebug build
>
> src/java.desktop/unix/native/libawt/awt/awt_LoadLibrary.c line 141:
> 
>> 139:         dladdr((void *)AWT_OnLoad, &dlinfo);
>> 140:         if (realpath((char *)dlinfo.dli_fname, buf) == NULL) {
>> 141:             perror((char *)dlinfo.dli_fname);
> 
> Having error handling is better than no error handling, but is `perror` the 
> best we can do?
> 
> OTOH, maybe it doesn't matter as much. Something would be very, very broken 
> if this were to fail.

I saw this in another bug report too from the same submitter.
I don't know that I want to encourage this as a pattern, except in debug 
builds. better might be to just copy dlinfo.dli_fname into buf ..

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22701#discussion_r1882797066

Reply via email to