On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 09:45:01 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I was afraid of this, and I don't know how to fix it. Without this file, >> the test never fails and becomes meaningless. > > I guess we can get rid of the test if we cannot test it reliably in CI as we > have precedent of fixing this kind of EUDC issue without test as in > JDK-8170913 if @prrace is ok with it @prrace Do you agree that the test is unnecessary here? We could leave it in the code with the relevant comment for reference and manual testing. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27551#discussion_r2473280690
