On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 14:02:34 GMT, Sergey Nazarkin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I guess we can get rid of the test if we cannot test it reliably in CI as we >> have precedent of fixing this kind of EUDC issue without test as in >> JDK-8170913 if @prrace is ok with it > > @prrace Do you agree that the test is unnecessary here? We could leave it in > the code with the relevant comment for reference and manual testing. >Without this file, the test never fails and becomes meaningless. Even on the system with JP locale? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27551#discussion_r2474255239
