> On Mar 27, 2017, at 09:51, Zach Tellman <ztell...@gmail.com> wrote: > > They also provide high-performance mutable variants of the data structure > which share an API with their immutable cousins.
How does their performance compare to Clojure's transients? Transients are slower than Java's native mutable collections, so if the mutable collections in this library deliver the same performance as the latter, they could act as a drop-in replacement for the former (given a compatible Clojure wrapper). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.