Off the top of my head, I think the only stuff in this area is the big bump in 
the asm bytecode version, which could theoretically come into play here. There 
were changes in reflection but I don’t think you’re doing reflection. I am 
going to poke at this some more so it would probably be good to file a CLJ jira 
to track it, if that’s possible.

> On Jan 16, 2019, at 5:10 PM, Matthew Phillips <mattp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I am pretty sure I'm using Java 8. I do have both Java 8 and Java 11 
> installed, but the environment it's built with:
> 
> $ java -version
> java version "1.8.0_162"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_162-b12)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.162-b12, mixed mode)
> 
> $ echo $JAVA_HOME
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_162.jdk/Contents/Home
> 
> Same environment, just changing Clojure versions. I assume there's a change 
> between Clojure 1.9 and 1.10 Java interop that explains the difference in 
> behaviour?
> 
> But AOT'ing using the wrong version of Java and deploying backwards certainly 
> seems like it fits the problem perfectly, given the change in ByteBuffer 
> between 8 and 9. Will further investigate.
> 
> Cheers. And thanks, Alex.
> 
>> On Wednesday, January 16, 2019 at 11:37:00 PM UTC+10:30, Alex Miller wrote:
>> Are you absolutely sure you’re not compiling on Java 9? I think Java 9 added 
>> a position on ByteBuffer with covariant return (other versions have it on 
>> the Buffer super class). 
>> 
>> From the error it looks like AOT compilation found the method and compiled 
>> it into the byte code, but then that method is not found at runtime. I think 
>> from eyeballing things (didn’t try it) that compiling with Java 9 and 
>> running on Java 8 could result in this.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/n6wpzSGj-Z0/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to