Matching Socks <phill.w...@gmail.com> writes: > This is not either/or.
Sure, I agree. When I said "I don't see a way around this type of job", I was responding to an earlier message that said that building an specification and an implementation that matched such specification a very tiresome one. My point was that working with specifications themselves is tiresome, so I couldn't see a way to avoid this tiresome job. But I agree with other implementations being available being a good thing. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/87v9eex2yb.fsf%40euandre.org.
