On Mar 17, 11:06 am, Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think you have been pretty clear right up until your previous e-mail
> where you implied that:
>
> (a)
> (defn a ...)
>
> should warn instead of error ;)
You are right, I misread the example and wrongly agreed to it.
I wanted to say that entering:
(defn a []
(b))
should issue a warning (and I don't think an exception is the right
way to warn the user). Then entering:
(a)
should issue an error, since 'b' is not bound. AFAIK, Lisp systems
would then allow you to enter the missing definition and restarting
the failed evaluation. Interactive development with steroids ^_^
Thanks for pointing out my mistake.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
