On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Elena <egarr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mar 17, 10:46 am, Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I understand why people want to be able to do things like this: >> >> (defn b [] (a)) >> (defn a [] (...)) > > That's what I'm asking for. > >> But that's completely different from the above. The above is more like: >> >> (a) >> (defn a [] (...)) >> >> Why would you want that to warn and not be an error? What would you >> expect it to do if it was just a warning? > > I'd like it to be an error. Maybe I've not stated that clearly.
I think you have been pretty clear right up until your previous e-mail where you implied that: (a) (defn a ...) should warn instead of error ;) -- Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
