On 28/03/2009, at 5:21 PM, Rayne wrote:
> I'd say Enclojure is close to > production-ready. From my playing with it, plus the list of things not yet done, I don't think this is true. The IntelliJ clojure support seems more advanced right now, and I'm starting to use that in production. IMO the new NetBeans 6.7 L&F on OSX now looks better than any other java IDE on OSX (but enclojure doesn't run on it). If enclojure did formatting and ran on 6.7 I'd probably choose that for Clojure development, although another consideration is that if you want to do mixed Scala/Clojure development, IntelliJ's Scala support has considerably loftier goals than Eclipse/NetBeans e.g. first-class support for the language model wrt refactoring etc. Antony Blakey -------------------------- CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd Ph: 0438 840 787 Lack of will power has caused more failure than lack of intelligence or ability. -- Flower A. Newhouse --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
