On Aug 25, 7:37 pm, Alan Busby <thebu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Reducing it further, I'd be interested just to hear more about the contrast > of static typing versus macros. Which is more beneficial for different > situations and why?
I fail to see how macros can be contrasted to static typeng. They are orthogonal. Here's and example of statically typed language (liskell) with lisp syntax and full blown lisp macros: http://blog.clemens.endorphin.org/2009/01/liskell-standalone.html --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
