On Oct 21, 4:27 pm, Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> wrote:
> I wonder if we got more manpower involved in that process if it would
> mean less work for Rich and the committer team when they are ready to
> apply patches since it weeds out the patches that are clearly not
> ready. Some projects I've worked on will not even consider a patch
> unless it's got three "+1" comments from people who have tested it,
> which encourages contributors to make an effort to get more people
> involved in the process.
Phil
I think that is a fantastic idea and is something I am interested in
participating in! I'll hold off spamming the tickets until the exact
process is agreed upon or dictated by Rich - my understanding is that
I'd just grab a patch, look at it to make sure it makes sense, test it
(maybe even add a test case if not there) and add a comment "works
great" on the ticket and any relevant info?
Regards,
Tim.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
