+1 This would be awesome for contrib, too.
On Oct 21, 2:03 am, Timothy Pratley <timothyprat...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 21, 4:27 pm, Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> wrote: > > > I wonder if we got more manpower involved in that process if it would > > mean less work for Rich and the committer team when they are ready to > > apply patches since it weeds out the patches that are clearly not > > ready. Some projects I've worked on will not even consider a patch > > unless it's got three "+1" comments from people who have tested it, > > which encourages contributors to make an effort to get more people > > involved in the process. > > Phil > > I think that is a fantastic idea and is something I am interested in > participating in! I'll hold off spamming the tickets until the exact > process is agreed upon or dictated by Rich - my understanding is that > I'd just grab a patch, look at it to make sure it makes sense, test it > (maybe even add a test case if not there) and add a comment "works > great" on the ticket and any relevant info? > > Regards, > Tim. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
