On Feb 2, 3:23 am, ataggart <alex.tagg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 2, 12:19 am, "A.Rost" <aravanc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I would like to have them available, simply because I > > like concise, purpose-built languages. > > That seems to presuppose you cannot have concise, purpose-built > languages with functions and macros. That may be the case, but I'd > like to see some rationale behind it. So far the only reason I can > think of to have a reader macro is to affect the *reader*.
That should read: with *only* functions and macros. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
