Hi, On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:11:48PM +0200, Heinz N. Gies wrote:
> Hmm this is slowish, you walk ks twice that way, i think the if-let > way is better, performance wise. Not sure if it really matters but for > really nested maps this might make a difference. If we restrict key "sequences" to vectors we could use pop and peek. However, I would expect key sequences to be sufficiently short for that to be a non-issue in the wild. And even if its slow: it is correct in all cases. I prefer slow, working programs over fast, broken ones. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
