slight error w/ the previous, local-get-in should have been local-get

(defn get-in
 ([m ks]
  (get-in m ks nil))
 ([m ks not-found]
  (letfn [(local-get [nf m ks] (get m ks nf))]
           (reduce (partial local-get not-found) m ks))))

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Russell Christopher <
russell.christop...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Try #2, change the order of arguments to "get" using partial
>
>
> (defn get-in
>  ([m ks]
>   (get-in m ks nil))
>  ([m ks not-found]
>   (letfn [(local-get-in [nf m ks] (get m ks nf))]
>            (reduce (partial local-get-in not-found) m ks))))
>
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:11:48PM +0200, Heinz N. Gies wrote:
>>
>> > Hmm this is slowish, you walk ks twice that way, i think the if-let
>> > way is better, performance wise. Not sure if it really matters but for
>> > really nested maps this might make a difference.
>>
>> If we restrict key "sequences" to vectors we could use pop and peek.
>> However, I would expect key sequences to be sufficiently short for
>> that to be a non-issue in the wild.
>>
>> And even if its slow: it is correct in all cases. I prefer slow,
>> working programs over fast, broken ones.
>>
>> Sincerely
>> Meikel
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to